Un parafoudre protège-t-il contre les surtensions ? Oui, mais la réponse dépend du type de surtension concerné. Un parafoudre est principalement conçu pour limiter les surtensions transitoires, tandis que les surtensions temporaires (TOV) et les tensions anormales permanentes nécessitent une analyse différente.

L'expression “ protection contre les surtensions ” peut être trompeuse, car toute surtension n'est pas nécessairement une surtension transitoire.

Considérons trois situations :

Une surtension induite par la foudre atteint un tableau électrique pendant une fraction de seconde seulement.

La tension d'alimentation augmente de manière significative pendant plusieurs secondes en raison d'un défaut sur le réseau.

Ou bien une rupture du neutre provoque le maintien d'une tension anormale sur une partie de l'installation jusqu'à ce que le défaut soit réparé.

Ces trois cas impliquent surtension, mais il ne s'agit pas du même phénomène électrique.

Et un parafoudre ne réagit pas de la même manière face à chacun d'eux.

La distinction la plus importante est la suivante :

Un parafoudre conventionnel est principalement conçu pour limiter les surtensions transitoires. Il ne doit pas être considéré automatiquement comme une protection contre les tensions d'alimentation anormales temporaires ou prolongées.

Cette distinction affecte le choix du parafoudre, l'analyse des défaillances et même la manière dont les ingénieurs interprètent un parafoudre endommagé.

IEC 61643-01:2024 définit les parafoudres basse tension comme des dispositifs contenant au moins un composant non linéaire et destinés à limiter les surtensions et à dériver les courants de choc. Pour les réseaux électriques basse tension en courant alternatif, les exigences relatives aux produits sont indiquées dans IEC 61643-11:2025.

Réponse rapide : Un parafoudre protège-t-il contre les surtensions ?

Oui, mais seulement contre certains types de surtensions.

Un parafoudre est principalement conçu pour surtensions transitoires, telles que celles causées par les effets de la foudre ou les manœuvres de commutation.

Il n'est normalement pas destiné à réguler la tension d'alimentation ou à déconnecter les charges lorsque la tension efficace reste trop élevée.

Le tableau ci-dessous présente la différence fondamentale.

C'est pourquoi la question :

“ Mon tableau électrique est-il déjà équipé d'un parafoudre ? ”

n'est pas la même que :

“ Mon équipement est-il protégé contre toutes les conditions de tension anormales ? ”

Ce n'est pas le cas.

Surtension transitoire vs TOV vs Surtension permanente

Le mot surtension est une catégorie large.

Comprendre la durée et la cause de l'événement est essentiel avant de décider quel dispositif de protection doit intervenir.

1. Surtension transitoire

Une surtension transitoire est une perturbation de tension de courte durée.

Les causes typiques incluent :

• les effets de la foudre ;
• les opérations de commutation ;
• la commutation de charges inductives ;
• commutation de condensateurs ;
• autres événements transitoires dans le système électrique.

Les tests standard des parafoudres utilisent généralement des formes d'onde impulsionnelles telles que la forme d'onde de courant 8/20 μs pour les applications de type 2.

L'événement se produit extrêmement rapidement.

C'est exactement l'environnement pour lequel un parafoudre est conçu. Si vous souhaitez examiner plus en détail le processus d'écrêtage et de dérivation du courant, consultez notre guide sur le fonctionnement d'un parafoudre CC.

Surtension temporaire — TOV

Une TOV est différente.

La tension reste élevée beaucoup plus longtemps qu'une impulsion et est généralement associée au réseau électrique plutôt qu'à une surtension isolée à l'échelle de la microseconde.

Les causes possibles peuvent inclure :

• défauts à la terre ;
• problèmes de neutre ;
• conditions de mise à la terre du système ;
• ferrorésonance ;
• problèmes de régulation de tension ;
• conditions de commutation anormales.

L'amplitude seule ne définit pas le risque.

Tension + durée + mode de protection + schéma de liaison à la terre + conception du parafoudre ont tous leur importance.

ABB, par exemple, distingue Uc, la tension maximale de régime permanent, de UT, tenue aux surtensions temporaires. Son Guide pratique OVR traite le comportement des TOV séparément de la performance face aux courants de choc et démontre que la contrainte applicable dépend du raccordement du parafoudre et de la configuration du réseau.

3. Surtension soutenue ou permanente

Si une tension d'alimentation anormale persiste au lieu de se comporter comme un événement de défaut temporaire, le problème d'ingénierie change à nouveau.

Un parafoudre conventionnel connecté en dérivation ne doit pas être utilisé comme régulateur de tension.

Un appareil conçu pour surveiller la tension efficace (RMS) et déclencher une déconnexion est normalement requis lorsque l'objectif de conception est :

Déconnecter la charge si la tension d'alimentation reste au-dessus ou au-dessous d'un seuil acceptable.

Par exemple, Schneider Electric Relais de contrôle de tension Harmony provide overvoltage and undervoltage monitoring functions. This is a different function from the high-speed surge-diversion role of an SPD.

Why Can an SPD Handle a Surge but Be Damaged by a TOV?

This seems contradictory at first.

An SPD may discharge a very large surge current measured in kiloamperes.

This is why asking “does an SPD protect against overvoltage?” requires first identifying whether the event is a transient surge, a TOV, or a sustained abnormal supply condition.

So why could a much smaller abnormal AC voltage damage it?

La réponse est :

Energy is not determined by current magnitude alone. Time matters.

Consider an MOV-based SPD.

Under normal operating voltage, the MOV remains in a high-impedance state and conducts only a very small current.

When a transient surge raises the voltage sufficiently, the MOV becomes conductive.

Surge current is diverted through the SPD and the voltage is limited.

The surge then disappears very quickly.

The MOV returns toward its normal high-impedance state.

A simplified sequence looks like this:

That last condition is the problem.

If the voltage does not disappear quickly enough, the MOV may continue conducting.

Electrical energy then becomes heat.

In simplified form:

abnormal voltage → MOV current → power dissipation → temperature rise → disconnector operation or component damage

This is why:

40 kA Imax does not mean that an SPD can withstand any abnormal supply voltage.

Imax describes a defined surge-current capability.

TOV behavior describes a completely different type of electrical stress.

Uc, Up and TOV: Three Different Questions

Another common source of confusion is mixing voltage specifications together.

Suppose an SPD datasheet contains Uc, Haut de la page and a TOV/UT specification.

They should not be compared as though they describe the same thing.

The IEC definition of an SPD focuses on limiting surge voltage and diverting surge current. IEC 61643-12:2020 separately covers selection, operation, location and coordination principles for AC power SPDs. If the differences between Uc, Up, In, Imax and Iscpv are not yet clear, see our guide des spécifications des parafoudres CC.

Does Higher Uc Mean Better TOV Protection?

Not automatically.

It is tempting to think:

Higher Uc = safer SPD.

C'est trop simpliste.

A suitably higher Uc can give more operating-voltage margin, but SPD selection involves a tradeoff.

The device must remain stable at the expected continuous system voltage while still providing an appropriate surge protection level.

NIST researchers have described this design dilemma for decades: an SPD must provide effective surge limitation without being expected to clamp longer-duration power-frequency overvoltages indefinitely.

Par conséquent :

Do not deliberately oversize Uc simply because you are worried about TOV.

Instead, check:

Real Case 1: A Documented TOV Above 150% Lasted About Four Seconds

This is where the distinction stops being theoretical.

A NIST-hosted paper by François Martzloff and Arshad Mansoor discusses actual power-system overvoltage scenarios.

One example cited from an EPRI report involved a power-system switching incident during restoration of power phase by phase.

The recorded condition produced an RMS voltage exceeding 150% of normal voltage for approximately four seconds.

The researchers identified the phenomenon as a temporary overvoltage associated with ferroresonance.

Notice what makes this different from a normal SPD surge event:

Four seconds may sound short to a person.

For an MOV that is dissipating abnormal power continuously, it is extremely long compared with a microsecond-scale surge.

Real Case 2: Commercial SPDs Were Tested Under Simulated TOV Conditions

Another NIST-hosted TOV study by researchers from Eaton Electrical, EPRI Solutions and François Martzloff investigated what happens when commercial SPDs experience several TOV conditions.

The study intentionally exposed commercial devices to conditions representing real power-system abnormalities.

The test program included the following examples:

The values relate to the study’s 120 V system basis; they must pas be copied directly as ratings for another SPD or another electrical system.

The result was especially important.

The researchers found that SPD response varied substantially depending on the product design.

The three cord-connected SPD specimens failed under the simulated 1.5 pu neutral-loss condition, while the two permanently connected specimens used in that study survived the first four test scenarios. Under the extreme 3.0 pu test, the permanently connected specimens experienced partial internal failure but retained some protective capability.

This should pas be interpreted as:

“Hardwired SPDs always survive TOV.”

The study used only a small group of specific products and represents historical designs.

Its real lesson is more useful:

Two products with similar-looking surge ratings may behave very differently under a long-duration abnormal voltage condition.

That is why TOV cannot be judged from Imax alone.

Does an SPD Protect Against Overvoltage Caused by Neutral Loss?

Neutral interruption is one of the most useful examples because it explains why the phrase “the SPD should clamp the voltage” can become dangerous.

In a multi-wire system with unequal phase-to-neutral loads, loss of the neutral can shift the neutral point.

The voltage across individual loads can then become severely unbalanced.

NIST describes loss-of-neutral conditions in North American 120/240 V three-wire systems where one side can approach twice normal voltage depending on the connected load impedances. The paper notes that such neutral problems may result from loose connections, mechanical damage or corrosion.

Now imagine an MOV-based SPD connected across the affected conductors.

If the abnormal power-frequency voltage pushes the MOV into conduction:

it begins conducting continuously.

But an MOV is not supposed to behave like a voltage regulator carrying that current indefinitely.

It may heat rapidly.

Eventually the result may be:

The last point is particularly important.

A typical parallel-connected SPD can disconnect itself while the protected circuit remains energized.

Par conséquent :

SPD failure or disconnection does not necessarily remove the abnormal voltage from the load.

A conventional SPD should therefore not be relied on as the sole protection against neutral-loss overvoltage. Where the design requires abnormal RMS voltage to be detected and the load disconnected, a dedicated voltage-monitoring or protection function may be needed. The neutral fault itself must still be located and corrected.

Why Doesn’t the SPD Simply Clamp the TOV?

Because doing so could require the SPD to absorb or divert power continuously.

Consider a simplified example.

A Type 2 MOV-based SPD is installed across the supply.

A brief transient occurs.

The MOV conducts for a very short time and then stops.

That is normal.

Now assume abnormal mains voltage remains high for many seconds.

If the MOV attempts to hold the voltage down continuously, the SPD essentially becomes part of a power-frequency current path.

The longer the current flows, the greater the thermal stress.

That can lead to:

thermal runaway → disconnector operation → loss of SPD protection or component damage

This is exactly why SPDs require coordinated fault and disconnection behavior rather than simply “clamping everything.”

TOV Withstand Does Not Mean TOV Protection for the Load

This distinction is extremely important when reading datasheets.

Suppose a manufacturer states that an SPD has a certain UT or TOV capability.

That generally describes the SPD’s behavior under specified test conditions.

It does not automatically mean:

“The downstream equipment will remain at normal voltage throughout the TOV.”

These are different functions.

Compare them:

Schneider’s Harmony control relays, for example, monitor overvoltage and undervoltage conditions with threshold and timing functions; this is fundamentally different from the shunt surge-diversion function of an SPD.

Can a Circuit Breaker Protect Against Overvoltage?

A standard circuit breaker should not automatically be treated as an overvoltage protector either.

Its primary job is overcurrent protection.

If voltage rises while load current remains below the breaker trip characteristic, an ordinary breaker may remain closed.

That means four devices can perform four different functions:

This is why replacing one device with another based only on the word “protection” is a mistake. For the separate question of SPD overcurrent coordination, see our guide to SPD backup fuse and circuit-breaker selection.

Can a Bigger kA SPD Solve a TOV Problem?

Non.

Suppose one SPD is rated:

In = 20 kA
Imax = 40 kA

and another says:

Imax = 60 kA

The 60 kA product is not automatically better at surviving a temporary power-frequency overvoltage.

The ratings describe different stresses.

Therefore, if SPDs repeatedly fail without obvious lightning activity, simply purchasing a higher-Imax model may not solve the actual problem.

Repeated SPD Failure: What Should You Investigate?

This is a situation where field diagnosis matters more than changing brands.

Use this investigation table.

NIST’s historical analysis lists power-system faults, poor voltage regulation, conductor problems, generator conditions, ferroresonance and loss of neutral among conditions capable of contributing to SPD overvoltage stress. If a device already shows a red indicator, abnormal heating or visible damage, our guide on comment savoir si un parafoudre est défectueux explains the next inspection steps.

What About TOV in Solar PV DC Systems?

Extra care is required here.

Most discussion of power-frequency TOV relates to AC systems.

A PV DC system has different operating conditions.

Important PV DC concerns include:

IEC 61643-31:2018 specifically covers SPDs intended for the DC side of PV installations up to 1500 V DC. IEC 61643-41:2025 now covers general DC low-voltage SPDs up to 1500 V DC, but it explicitly excludes PV applications, which remain within IEC 61643-31.

Therefore, do not take an AC TOV number from a 230/400 V AC SPD datasheet and assume the same rule applies to a 1000 V or 1500 V PV SPD.

For PV systems, check the exact:

Ucpv + topology + protection mode + manufacturer documentation + applicable PV SPD standard.

For voltage selection, see our DC SPD voltage selection guide. For grounded versus floating PV arrangements and protection paths, see 2P vs 3P DC SPD for Solar PV.

AC SPD vs PV DC SPD Under Overvoltage

This is another reason AC and DC SPDs should not be interchanged casually.

IEC currently lists IEC 61643-11:2025 for AC low-voltage SPDs, while IEC 61643-31:2018 addresses PV DC SPDs. For a practical explanation of why an AC-only SPD should not simply be moved to a DC circuit, see What Happens If You Use an AC SPD on a DC System?.

Common Mistakes About SPD and Overvoltage

How to Select an SPD When TOV Is a Concern

Instead of starting with:

“How many kA do I need?”

start with the electrical system.

Installation also matters after the product is selected. Long SPD connecting conductors can increase the voltage appearing at the protected equipment during a fast surge; see our guide to SPD distance from the inverter and SPD lead length.

This order avoids a common purchasing mistake:

choosing the largest kA number first and checking voltage compatibility later.

Practical Example: Diagnosing an SPD That Keeps Failing

Assume an electrician installs a new Type 2 SPD.

A few days later the status window indicates replacement.

A new cartridge is installed.

It fails again.

It would be easy to conclude:

“The SPD quality is poor.”

But that is only one possibility.

A better troubleshooting sequence is:

Only after these checks should repeated SPD replacement be treated as a simple product issue.

SPD vs Overvoltage Relay: Do You Need Both?

In some installations, yes.

They solve different problems.

Think of them this way:

SPD:
“What happens if a very fast surge arrives?”

Voltage monitoring protection:
“What happens if the supply voltage remains abnormal?”

A system containing both functions may therefore provide broader protection than either one alone.

But the exact protection design depends on the installation, applicable codes and equipment requirements.

SPD Overvoltage Protection Checklist

Before approving an SPD specification, confirm the following:

Questions fréquemment posées

Does an SPD Protect Against Overvoltage or High Voltage?

An SPD primarily protects against transient overvoltage, such as short-duration surges caused by lightning effects or switching events. It should not automatically be treated as protection against every temporary or sustained abnormal supply voltage. If the supply voltage remains excessively high, separate voltage monitoring or disconnection protection may be required.

Can an SPD protect against temporary overvoltage?

It depends on the SPD and the specific TOV condition.

The datasheet or manufacturer documentation may specify TOV withstand or behavior for defined voltage, duration and connection conditions.

Do not assume that every SPD will survive every TOV.

What happens if mains voltage stays above the SPD’s Uc?

The result depends on how far the voltage exceeds Uc, how long it lasts and the SPD design.

In an MOV-based SPD, excessive continuous voltage can increase MOV current and heating.

This may eventually cause thermal disconnection or damage.

Is TOV the same as a lightning surge?

Non.

A lightning-related surge is a short transient event.

A TOV lasts much longer and is usually associated with a power-system abnormality.

The stresses placed on an SPD are therefore very different.

Does Imax tell me the TOV capability?

Non.

Imax is a surge-current parameter.

TOV behavior must be evaluated separately.

Does a 40 kA SPD protect against a 400 V overvoltage?

That question cannot be answered from 40 kA.

You need to know the nominal system voltage, Uc, connection mode, TOV declaration, duration of the abnormal voltage and the SPD design.

Can an SPD prevent damage from a broken neutral?

Do not rely on an SPD alone.

A broken or displaced neutral can create dangerous abnormal phase-to-neutral voltages.

Neutral integrity must be restored, and where required a dedicated voltage-monitoring and disconnection function should be used.

Can a circuit breaker replace an SPD?

Non.

A conventional circuit breaker protects primarily against overcurrent and short circuit.

An SPD limits transient overvoltage.

They perform different functions.

Can an overvoltage relay replace an SPD?

Non.

A voltage-monitoring relay can detect abnormal RMS voltage and initiate a switching action.

It does not replace the high-speed surge-diversion function of an SPD.

Conclusion

Ainsi, does an SPD protect against overvoltage?

The technically correct answer is:

An SPD protects against transient overvoltage, but it should not be treated as universal protection against every temporary or sustained abnormal voltage condition.

Surge current ratings such as In, Imax and Iimp describe transient performance.

Uc/Ucpv describes continuous voltage compatibility.

Haut de la page describes surge-voltage limitation.

And TOV behavior describes how the SPD responds to a specified temporary abnormal-voltage condition.

These parameters should never be treated as interchangeable.

Real-world research also shows why the distinction matters. NIST/EPRI investigations found dramatically different SPD responses to temporary-overvoltage conditions, ranging from survival to internal failure depending on the device and the applied stress.

The practical rule is simple:

First identify the electrical event. Then select the protection function.

Use an SPD for transient surge protection.

Use appropriate voltage monitoring or disconnection when persistent abnormal supply voltage must be detected and removed.

And if SPDs repeatedly fail, investigate system voltage, neutral condition, earthing, Uc/Ucpv and TOV conditions before simply replacing the module again.

For PV applications, always verify the exact SPD model against the system’s maximum DC voltage, PV topology and applicable IEC 61643-31 requirements.