WengYang Industrial Zone Yueqing Wenzhou 325000
Horas de trabalho
De segunda a sexta-feira: das 7h às 19h
Fim de semana: 10:00 - 17:00
WengYang Industrial Zone Yueqing Wenzhou 325000
Horas de trabalho
De segunda a sexta-feira: das 7h às 19h
Fim de semana: 10:00 - 17:00

Uma folha de dados de dispositivo de proteção contra surtos (DPS) pode apresentar classificações impressionantes, mas como verificar se o produto atende realmente aos requisitos do seu projeto?
Para distribuidores elétricos, importadores, fabricantes de OEM e empreiteiros EPC solares, a escolha de um fornecedor de DPS envolve mais do que comparar preços ou classificações de corrente de descarga.
Um fornecedor pode cotar um DPS Tipo 2 com uma corrente de descarga máxima de 40 kA. Outro pode fornecer um documento relacionado à CE, um relatório de teste ou um certificado ISO 9001.
Mas esses documentos não provam todos a mesma coisa.
Um relatório de teste pode referir-se a um modelo diferente. Um certificado pode cobrir apenas certas configurações. Uma folha de dados pode omitir requisitos críticos de instalação.
A pergunta mais importante não é quantos documentos um fabricante de DPS pode fornecer, mas se esses documentos demonstram que o produto exato é adequado para sua aplicação.
Este guia explica nove documentos essenciais de fabricantes de DPS, como verificar o seu conteúdo e o que a documentação real do fabricante pode ensinar aos compradores antes de fazer uma encomenda.
No mínimo, os compradores devem obter uma folha de dados específica do modelo, evidências de teste aplicáveis e instruções de instalação. Declarações adicionais, certificações, registos de qualidade e documentos comerciais dependem do produto, do mercado de destino e dos requisitos de compra.
| Documento | Objetivo principal | Quando solicitar |
|---|---|---|
| Folha de dados do produto | Confirmar tensão, Tipo de DPS, classificações de descarga e modelo | Antes da aprovação da cotação |
| Relatório de teste IEC/EN ou aplicável | Rever evidências de desempenho e segurança de suporte | Antes da aprovação técnica |
| Declaração de Conformidade | Verificar a conformidade declarada com os regulamentos aplicáveis | Quando exigido para o mercado de destino |
| Certificação de terceiros | Verificar certificação independente e modelos cobertos | Onde disponível ou exigido |
| Manual de instalação | Verificar cablagem, proteção de backup e condições de instalação | Antes da instalação da amostra |
| Desenhos mecânicos | Confirmar compatibilidade física e de montagem | Antes da aprovação do projeto do painel |
| Registros de inspeção de qualidade de fábrica | Avaliar a consistência da produção | Antes da produção em massa |
| Rastreabilidade do produto e garantia | Identificar lotes e responsabilidades pós-venda | Antes da ordem de compra |
| Documentos comerciais e de expedição | Confirmar informações de remessa, quantidade e importação | Durante o pedido e a remessa |
Nem todo comprador precisa de toda a documentação.
Por exemplo, um distribuidor elétrico europeu pode priorizar uma Declaração de Conformidade da UE, enquanto um empreiteiro EPC solar pode dar maior ênfase a evidências de teste específicas para fotovoltaicos e requisitos de instalação.
As seções a seguir explicam como decidir.
Uma folha de dados técnica é o ponto de partida para toda decisão de compra de DPS.
No entanto, uma boa folha de dados deve fazer mais do que exibir algumas especificações atraentes.
Ela deve fornecer informações suficientes para avaliar se o dispositivo é apropriado para o sistema elétrico em que será instalado.
| Parâmetro | Significado | O que os compradores devem verificar |
|---|---|---|
| Uc | Tensão máxima de operação contínua | Adequado para o sistema elétrico |
| Ucpv | Tensão máxima de operação contínua para um DPS fotovoltaico | Adequado para tensão máxima do arranjo fotovoltaico |
| Em | Corrente nominal de descarga | Valor declarado e forma de onda de teste |
| Imax | Corrente máxima de descarga | Classificação de impulso Tipo 2 aplicável |
| Iimp | Corrente de descarga de impulso | Capacidade Tipo 1, quando aplicável |
| Para cima | Nível de proteção de tensão | Apropriado para proteção de equipamentos |
| Isccr / SCCR | Capacidade de corrente de curto-circuito | Corresponde às condições de falha prospectivas |
| Iscpv | Característica de corrente de curto-circuito PV | Adequado para a aplicação PV |
| Modos de proteção | Combinações de condutores protegidos | Compatível com a topologia do sistema |
| Sinalização remota | Capacidade de monitoramento de status | Arranjo de terminais e classificações de contato |

Nem todos os parâmetros se aplicam a todos os DPS.
Um DPS CA Tipo 2 e um DPS CC fotovoltaico Tipo 1+2 podem exigir informações técnicas diferentes.
Os compradores devem, portanto, evitar avaliar todos os DPS com uma única lista genérica de parâmetros.
Para uma explicação mais aprofundada sobre os requisitos de instalação e tensão, consulte o nosso guia sobre DPS integrados e externos para inversores solares.
A Phoenix Contact publica uma especificação técnica detalhada para o seu VAL-MS 230/3+1 FM/32, número de encomenda 2908476.
As suas características listadas publicamente incluem:
| Parâmetro | Valor publicado |
|---|---|
| Produto | VAL-MS 230/3+1 FM/32 |
| Número de encomenda | 2908476 |
| Tipo de SPD | Tipo 2 |
| Tensão nominal do sistema | 240/415 V CA |
| Uc, L-N | 275 V CA |
| Entrada (8/20 µs) | 20 kA |
| Imax (8/20 µs) | 40 kA |
| Up, L-N | ≤ 1,35 kV |
| Up, L-PE | ≤ 1,6 kV |
| Capacidade de corrente de curto-circuito | 25 kA |
Fonte: Phoenix Contact — VAL-MS 230/3+1 FM/32 Dados Oficiais do Produto
O que torna este exemplo útil?
O fabricante não descreve o produto simplesmente como um “DPS de 40 kA”.”
Ele publica características de tensão, valores separados de modo de proteção, compatibilidade do sistema elétrico e informações de curto-circuito.
Esses detalhes são importantes quando os engenheiros comparam produtos.
Lição do comprador: Dois DPS com o mesmo valor de Imax podem ter diferentes níveis de proteção, tensões de operação, modos de proteção e capacidades de curto-circuito.
Uma decisão de compra baseada apenas em “20 kA” ou “40 kA” é incompleta.
Um relatório de teste de DPS fornece evidências sobre o desempenho e a avaliação de segurança de um produto testado.
No entanto, uma referência IEC em um documento não significa automaticamente que o produto foi certificado independentemente.
O primeiro passo é identificar qual norma se aplica.
| Padrão | Aplicativo | Informações importantes sobre o escopo |
|---|---|---|
| IEC 61643-01:2024 | Requisitos gerais de DPS | Common requirements and test methods |
| IEC 61643-11:2025 | AC low-voltage power SPDs | AC circuits rated up to 1,000 V RMS |
| IEC 61643-31:2018 | Photovoltaic DC SPDs | DC side of PV installations up to 1,500 V DC |
Official references:
IEC 61643-11:2025 was published on June 18, 2025, and includes revised requirements relating to AC SPD performance and safety testing.
IEC 61643-31:2018 specifically addresses SPDs intended for the DC side of photovoltaic installations up to 1,500 V DC.
These are different application categories.
Consider a buyer sourcing a 1,500 V DC SPD for a utility-scale solar project.
The supplier presents a test report referring only to IEC 61643-11.
Should the buyer accept it?
Not without further clarification.
IEC 61643-11 addresses AC low-voltage power systems, while IEC 61643-31 provides the photovoltaic DC-specific requirements.
A supplier may have additional relevant testing documentation, but the buyer should confirm the applicable assessment for the offered PV model.
| Checkpoint | Acceptable evidence | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Model number | Offered model is covered | Only another product is listed |
| Padrão | Relevant standard and edition | Incorrect application standard |
| Laboratory | Identifiable testing organization | Laboratory details missing |
| Report number | Traceable report identifier | Incomplete or untraceable reference |
| Ratings | Consistent with product datasheet | Different voltage or current values |
| Model family | Documented scope or annex | Coverage is only assumed |
| Test results | Relevant evaluation results provided | Only a cover page is supplied |
| Report limitations | Conditions and exclusions are understood | Important annexes are missing |
Importante: A report issued under an older edition is not automatically invalid. Buyers should check the accepted edition for their destination market, customer specification, and certification arrangement.

One of the most common problems in international electrical product procurement is confusion over CE documentation.
Some buyers request a “CE certificate” without specifying which document they actually need.
However, CE marking, an EU Declaration of Conformity, and independent third-party certification are not interchangeable.
The European Commission explains that the manufacturer is responsible for conformity assessment, preparing technical documentation, issuing the EU Declaration of Conformity, and applying CE marking where applicable.
CE marking itself does not indicate that an EU authority has approved the product.
Fonte: European Commission — CE Marking and Manufacturer Responsibilities
| Document or marking | Who is responsible? | What it demonstrates |
|---|---|---|
| Marcação CE | Fabricante | Manufacturer’s declaration of conformity with applicable EU requirements |
| EU Declaration of Conformity | Manufacturer or responsible authorized party | Formal declaration identifying applicable EU legislation |
| Supporting technical file | Fabricante | Evidence supporting the conformity assessment |
| Third-party product certificate | Relevant certification organization | Certification within the specific scheme and product scope |
| ISO 9001 certificate | Quality management certification body | Quality management system certification, not individual SPD product compliance |
A product marked CE should not automatically be described as “EU-certified.”
Similarly, ISO 9001 does not establish that an individual SPD model meets IEC 61643 requirements.
Review the product identification, manufacturer details, relevant EU legislation, applicable standards or technical specifications, issue information, and signature.
For European shipments, the documents and responsibilities must meet the legal requirements applying to the product and market.
A generic certificate cannot replace these obligations.
Practical recommendation: Ask the supplier for the Declaration of Conformity applicable to the exact product rather than relying on a CE logo printed on its packaging.
Independent certification can be valuable, particularly for regulated markets or projects with strict technical approval procedures.
Buyers may encounter IECEE CB Scheme documents, UL certification records, TÜV-issued certificates, and national product approvals.
However, the relevant certification depends on the applicable market and scheme.
| Item | What to verify | Por que é importante |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate number | Officially traceable | Helps establish authenticity |
| Certificate holder | Identified legal entity | May differ from the trading company |
| Fabricante | Actual product manufacturer | Confirms manufacturing relationship |
| Factory location | Covered production location | Important for certain certification schemes |
| Product model | Exact model or listed family | Prevents unsupported model claims |
| Padrão | Applicable technical requirements | Confirms relevance |
| Certificate status | Current status and restrictions | Certification scope can change |
| Annexes | Covered variants and ratings | Important for multipole and OEM models |

UL Solutions provides Product iQ, an official database for searching UL certification information.
Users can search using information such as a file number, product category, or other product identifiers.
Official source: UL Solutions — Product iQ Certification Database
For example, a buyer receiving a claimed UL certification can check whether the relevant product or component appears within the applicable UL certification records.
The buyer should also check the covered models and product category rather than assuming certification applies to the entire manufacturer’s catalog.
Lição do comprador: A certificate from a recognized organization is valuable only when its scope applies to the product being purchased.
An SPD can have suitable electrical ratings and still be inappropriate for a particular installation if its connection and protection requirements are not followed.
A complete installation guide helps electrical engineers verify the correct arrangement.
| Installation information | Por que é importante |
|---|---|
| Connection diagram | Confirms the correct electrical arrangement |
| Earthing and protection modes | Supports proper surge diversion paths |
| Backup fuse or circuit breaker | Ensures protective-device coordination |
| Maximum upstream protection | Helps determine whether additional protection is required |
| Short-circuit conditions | Helps assess suitability for available fault current |
| Torque do terminal | Supports proper electrical connections |
| Secção transversal do condutor | Helps confirm compatible wiring |
| Mechanical mounting | Prevents panel assembly conflicts |
| Status indication | Supports maintenance and replacement decisions |
| Remote signaling contacts | Supports external alarm or monitoring integration |

DEHN’s published documentation for its DEHNguard M TNS ACI 275 FM, part number 952 440, identifies several important characteristics.
| Parâmetro | Valor publicado |
|---|---|
| Modelo | DG M TNS ACI 275 FM |
| Part number | 952 440 |
| Tipo de SPD | Tipo 2 |
| Uc (L-PE) | 275 V CA |
| Entrada (8/20 µs) | 20 kA |
| Up (L-PE) | ≤ 1,5 kV |
| Additional external fuse | Não é necessário |
Fonte: DEHN — DEHNguard ACI Product Technical Documentation (PDF)
This example illustrates an important purchasing consideration.
Not every SPD requires a separate external backup fuse.
The correct protection arrangement depends on the specific product design, tested configuration, and manufacturer instructions.
A buyer should therefore never select backup protection simply because another Type 2 SPD uses a particular fuse rating.
For further technical guidance, read our SPD backup fuse and circuit breaker selection guide.
For panel builders and OEM customers, mechanical compatibility can be as important as electrical performance.
An SPD may satisfy the required electrical specifications but still cause problems during panel assembly.
For example, an alternative model may occupy a different DIN-rail width or use a different terminal arrangement.
| Document detail | Aplicativo |
|---|---|
| Overall dimensions | Enclosure layout |
| Montagem em trilho DIN | Mechanical compatibility |
| Terminal positions | Roteamento de cabos |
| Required clearances | Installation planning |
| Module width | Panel space calculation |
| Remote contact location | Monitoring wiring |
| Replaceable module structure | Maintenance planning |
Buyers should also confirm whether the product delivered during bulk production matches the approved sample and drawings.
This is particularly relevant for OEM distribution boards, PV combiner boxes, and standardized industrial control panels.

A type-test report provides evidence of a product design evaluated under specified conditions.
It does not automatically establish that every production unit has been manufactured without defects.
This is why factory quality management and traceability are important for larger procurement projects.
| Documento | What buyers can learn |
|---|---|
| Incoming inspection records | How critical materials are checked |
| Routine inspection procedures | Which tests or checks occur during production |
| Final inspection records | How finished products are evaluated |
| Batch identification | Whether affected production lots can be traced |
| Nonconformity reports | How production defects are handled |
| Corrective-action records | Whether identified problems lead to improvements |
| Quality management certificate | Whether a documented management system is certified |
The exact routine tests and acceptance criteria should be defined by the relevant product requirements and supplier’s quality procedures.
Buyers should avoid assuming that a factory holding ISO 9001 certification has automatically obtained product certification for every SPD it manufactures.

Suppose a distributor plans to purchase 5,000 SPDs under a private label.
Before approving mass production, the buyer could request:
This is an illustrative procurement scenario, not a claim about a particular manufacturer’s inspection results.
The objective is to verify whether the supplier can consistently manufacture the approved product.
Private-label SPD procurement introduces additional documentation questions.
A distributor may purchase an existing SPD design under its own brand with a different printed model number.
However, a new logo does not automatically mean the branded version is independently certified.
Equally, the existence of an original manufacturer’s certificate does not automatically establish that every private-label variation is covered.
| OEM change | What buyers should confirm |
|---|---|
| Brand name change | Relationship to the assessed product |
| Model number change | Documented model equivalence |
| Label redesign | Required technical and regulatory markings |
| Enclosure change | Whether existing assessment remains applicable |
| Internal component change | Whether additional technical evaluation is needed |
| Manufacturing location change | Whether certification or approval scope is affected |
| Wiring modification | Compatibility with original testing and installation instructions |
Before approving an OEM order, request the approved product specification, label artwork, applicable test evidence, and written confirmation of any model-equivalence arrangement.
Where a third-party certification is claimed, confirm that the relevant certification scheme permits the proposed configuration and labeling.
Technical approval should continue through the purchasing and shipping process.
A mismatch between the approved model and the commercial documents can create customs, project acceptance, or inventory problems.
| Documento | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Proforma Invoice | Approved model, quantity, price and trade terms |
| Commercial Invoice | Correct shipment details and product descriptions |
| Packing List | Package count, quantities, weights and dimensions |
| Certificate of Origin | Origin information when required |
| Bill of Lading / Air Waybill | Consistent shipment information |
| Inspection report | Agreed production or shipment checks |
| Warranty terms | Responsibility for eligible claims |
A Certificate of Origin is a trade document. It does not establish an SPD’s electrical safety or performance.
Likewise, an inspection report covering packaging and quantity does not replace a laboratory test report.

The following examples are drawn from public manufacturer and regulatory documents. They are not estimates of field failure rates or unverified customer stories.
| Official example | Verified information | Purchasing lesson |
|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Contact VAL-MS 230/3+1 FM/32 | In 20 kA, Imax 40 kA, mode-specific Up values | Compare complete electrical characteristics, not one rating |
| DEHNguard M TNS ACI 275 FM | Manufacturer indicates no additional external fuse required | Installation requirements are model-specific |
| European Commission CE guidance | Manufacturer is responsible for EU conformity assessment and DoC | CE marking is not equivalent to independent product certification |
These examples highlight three different areas of risk:
Technical risk: Selecting a product based on incomplete specifications.
Installation risk: Applying protection requirements from another SPD model.
Documentation risk: Misinterpreting what a compliance document actually proves.
Reliable SPD procurement should address all three.
Check which documents your SPD supplier has provided before placing an order.
0% completed
Core = documents generally needed for initial technical review. Additional requirements depend on your market and project.
Have questions about SPD specifications, test reports or documentation? Contact KUANGYA to discuss your requirements.
Contact KUANGYA on WhatsAppYour checklist details will be included in the WhatsApp message. You can review the message before sending.
Note: This tool checks document availability only. It does not confirm certification validity, document authenticity, or regulatory compliance.
The most efficient documentation process is to review information in stages, rather than requesting every possible file without a clear purpose.
Identify the AC or DC system, maximum operating voltage, required SPD Type, installation location, and destination market.
Confirm the quoted model and its electrical ratings.
Check the relevant standards, model coverage, test organization, and report details.
Check declarations and certificates required for the intended market.
Review the manufacturer’s wiring, short-circuit, backup protection, terminal, and mounting requirements.
For repeat or OEM orders, retain approved drawings, labels, specifications, and quality criteria.
Confirm that invoices, packing lists, and product identification correspond to the approved order.
| Purchasing stage | Documents to prioritize |
|---|---|
| Initial inquiry | Datasheet and model identification |
| Supplier comparison | Test evidence and relevant certifications |
| Technical approval | Installation manual and mechanical drawings |
| Avaliação de amostras | Label, configuration and sample inspection |
| Purchase order | Warranty, traceability and approved specifications |
| Production | Agreed quality and inspection records |
| Shipment | Commercial Invoice, Packing List and transport documents |
This staged approach can reduce unnecessary communication while keeping critical technical checks ahead of the purchase decision.
Not every missing document means a supplier is unreliable. Some reports may be confidential, market-specific, or held by an external certification body.
However, unresolved inconsistencies are a legitimate reason to delay technical approval.
| Warning sign | Potential issue | Ação recomendada |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate covers a different model | Unclear product coverage | Request scope or annex |
| Datasheet and label disagree | Specification inconsistency | Confirm approved revision |
| Only a CE logo is provided | Insufficient compliance information | Request applicable DoC |
| PV SPD has only AC evidence | Application mismatch | Request relevant PV test evidence |
| Certificate number cannot be verified | Authenticity or status uncertainty | Check with issuer |
| Installation guide omits protection requirements | Incomplete installation information | Request model-specific instructions |
| OEM model is absent from documents | Unclear branding relationship | Request equivalence evidence |
| No production traceability information | Difficult batch investigation | Agree on traceability process |
| Production differs from approved sample | Uncontrolled design change | Investigate before shipment |
Subject: Request for SPD Technical Documents and Model Verification
Hello,
We are reviewing surge protective devices for an upcoming project and would like to verify the technical documentation for your quoted models.
Could you please provide the following?
Please confirm that the supplied documents cover the exact model numbers, voltage ratings, and configurations included in your quotation.
Thank you.
The essential starting documents are a model-specific datasheet, applicable test evidence, and installation instructions.
Additional documentation depends on the installation, destination market, project specification, and purchasing requirements.
For products subject to applicable EU CE-marking legislation, the manufacturer must fulfill the relevant conformity requirements, including the applicable declaration and technical documentation obligations.
A separately marketed “CE certificate” is not necessarily a legally required or sufficient conformity document.
IEC 61643-11 addresses AC low-voltage surge protective devices.
IEC 61643-31 is the relevant product standard for SPDs intended for the DC side of photovoltaic installations within its scope.
Não.
ISO 9001 concerns quality management systems and does not replace model-specific technical evaluation or product conformity evidence.
Potentially, where the assessment or certification scope explicitly includes the relevant models and configurations.
Buyers should verify model-family coverage rather than assume it.
Não necessariamente.
Start with the key documents needed for technical evaluation. More detailed evidence can be requested based on project requirements, order size, and supplier qualification procedures.
Check the issuing organization, certificate number, model coverage, applicable standard, and certification status. Use the certification body’s official records where available.
The most valuable SPD manufacturer documents are those that help buyers connect three things:
The actual product being offered.
The performance and compliance evidence supporting that product.
The installation and production conditions under which it will be used.
A complete supplier qualification process should evaluate product specifications, applicable testing, certification scope, installation compatibility, and manufacturing consistency.
The objective is not to collect the largest number of certificates.
It is to obtain the right evidence for the right SPD.
For buyers comparing Chinese SPD manufacturers, our guide to evaluating SPD suppliers in China provides additional supplier-selection considerations.
KUANGYA supplies surge protective devices and related low-voltage electrical protection products for international customers, distributors, and OEM projects.
Tell us your application, SPD Type, system voltage, destination market, and required specifications.
Our team can help discuss suitable products and the model-specific technical documentation available for review.
Visit KUANGYA — www.cnkuangya.com
Technical note: Standards, certification scopes, and regulatory requirements may change. Always verify the applicable editions and approval requirements for the intended market and exact product model.