SPD distance from inverter is an important part of solar PV surge protection design, especially when the SPD is installed in a combiner box or near the PV array.

You have installed a DC surge protective device in the PV system, but the SPD is inside the combiner box while the inverter is 20 or 30 meters away.

A very practical question follows:

Is that SPD still enough to protect the inverter?

Or should another SPD be installed closer to the inverter?

The answer is:

Yes, distance matters.

In a photovoltaic system, surge protection is not determined only by whether an SPD exists somewhere on the DC circuit. The distance between the PV array and inverter, the location of the SPD, the length of the SPD connecting conductors, the equipment impulse withstand voltage, and the lightning protection arrangement all affect the final protection concept.

IEC 61643-32 specifically addresses the selection, installation, and coordination of SPDs used in photovoltaic installations up to 1,500 V DC. It distinguishes between short and long distances between the PV modules and the inverter and gives specific requirements for SPD placement.

So the correct question is not simply:

“Do I already have an SPD?”

It is:

“Is the SPD installed at the right location to protect the equipment I care about?”

Quick Answer

For PV installations covered by the relevant configurations in IEC 61643-32:

• when the cable-route distance between the PV modules and inverter is less than 10 m, one set of SPDs may be sufficient, provided the applicable protection conditions are satisfied;
• when that distance is 10 m or more, IEC 61643-32 states that two sets of SPDs are necessary to sufficiently protect both the PV modules and the inverter for the configurations covered by Clauses 6.2.1 and 6.2.2;
• where an external lightning protection system is present and the required separation distance cannot be maintained, the protection requirements are more stringent, and the second SPD at the inverter is mandatory in the configuration addressed by Clause 6.2.3.

At the same time, do not confuse this 10 m system distance with the approximately 0.5 m SPD connection-lead recommendation.

They describe two different electrical problems.

Key Takeaways

Why Does SPD Distance From Inverter Matter?

A common misunderstanding is that copper cable is electrically insignificant during a surge.

At normal operating frequency or steady DC current, that assumption may seem reasonable.

A lightning-related surge is different.

Surge current changes extremely quickly. Every conductor has inductance, and when current changes rapidly through that inductance, a voltage develops across the conductor.

The basic relationship is:

ΔU = L × di/dt

Where:

ΔU = additional inductive voltage across the conductor
L = conductor inductance
di/dt = rate of change of surge current

This equation is not unique to surge protection. It is a basic electromagnetic relationship.

For SPD installation, however, it explains something very important:

The conductor connected to the SPD becomes part of the surge-protection circuit.

Phoenix Contact’s surge protection installation guidance gives an illustrative example using approximately 1 µH/m of conductor inductance. With a current change of 10 kA over 10 µs, approximately 1 kV can develop across one meter of conductor. This is an illustration rather than a universal design value because actual inductance depends on conductor geometry and routing.

This is why SPD manufacturers repeatedly emphasize short, direct connections.

Up Is Not Necessarily the Voltage Seen by the Inverter

Suppose an SPD datasheet states:

Voltage protection level Up = 2.5 kV

A common interpretation is:

“If this SPD operates, the inverter will see no more than 2.5 kV.”

That is too simple.

Up is the voltage protection level of the SPD determined under specified test conditions.

Once the SPD is installed inside a real electrical system, voltage developed across its connecting conductors must also be considered.

A simplified way of thinking about the installed protection level is:

Effective voltage at the protected equipment ≈ SPD Up + voltage contribution from the connecting conductors

Schneider Electric illustrates this relationship using the conductor inductance equation and describes the installed protection level as the SPD Up plus the voltage developed in its connections.

That does not mean you should simply add one fixed number to every SPD datasheet.

The actual value depends on:

• conductor length,
• conductor arrangement,
• loop area,
• surge current,
• surge waveform,
• bonding arrangement,
• and the point at which voltage is being evaluated.

The practical lesson is much simpler:

A good SPD with poor wiring can provide worse installed protection than its datasheet alone suggests.

If you are not familiar with Ucpv, In, Imax, Up and Iscpv, see our guide on how to read a DC SPD label before evaluating SPD placement.

SPD-to-Inverter Distance and SPD Lead Length Are Not the Same Thing

This distinction is critical because SPD distance from inverter is often confused with the length of the SPD’s own connecting conductors.

People often say:

“The SPD must be close.”

But “close” may refer to two completely different distances.

Distance 1: PV Array / SPD Location to the Inverter

Consider this arrangement:

PV Array → Combiner Box + SPD → 30 m DC Cable → Inverter

The question here is whether the protection provided at one end of the long cable is sufficient for equipment at the other end.

This is a system-level SPD placement and coordination issue.

This is where the IEC 61643-32 10 m provision becomes relevant.

Distance 2: The SPD’s Own Connecting Conductors

Now imagine:

DC Cable → SPD → PE / Bonding Point

The SPD may be installed physically beside the inverter, but its connecting wires may be long and looped around the enclosure.

That is a different problem.

IEC 61643-32 states for the DC-side arrangement in Clause 9.2.5 that the total length of the relevant connecting cables, shown as L1 + L2, should be as short as possible and preferably should not exceed 0.5 m total lead length.

So:

10 m ≠ 0.5 m

The first concerns the distance between protected parts of the PV system.

The second concerns the SPD’s own electrical connection.

Mixing these two numbers produces a lot of incorrect SPD advice online.

What Exactly Does IEC 61643-32 Say About 10 m?

When engineers discuss SPD distance from inverter in a PV system, the 10 m value is one of the most important distances to understand.

IEC 61643-32:2017 Clause 9.2.5 addresses installation of SPDs on the DC side.

For PV installations described in 6.2.1 and 6.2.2, it states that when distance E between the PV modules and inverter is equal to or greater than 10 m, two sets of SPDs are necessary to sufficiently protect both the PV modules and inverter.

When the distance between the protected units is less than 10 m, one set of SPDs may be enough. The standard also notes that, for common PV modules, the inverter normally has the lower rated impulse withstand voltage, so installation of the SPD close to the inverter is recommended.

This means that the often-mentioned “10-meter rule” is not simply an industry habit.

It has a specific basis in IEC 61643-32.

However, it should not be transformed into an oversimplified statement such as:

“Every solar installation anywhere in the world automatically requires two SPDs once the cable reaches exactly 10 meters.”

That is also incorrect.

IEC 61643-32 defines specific PV configurations, and national adoption, local installation standards, equipment instructions, risk assessment, and lightning protection conditions still have to be considered.

Which PV Installations Does the 10 m Requirement Apply To?

The context matters.

IEC 61643-32 separates common PV installations into several arrangements.

PV Installation Without an External Lightning Protection System

This is the configuration described in Clause 6.2.1.

In general, IEC illustrates protection at both the inverter side and PV-array side, but it allows one of the DC SPDs to be omitted under specified conditions.

For example, where the distance between inverter and PV array is less than 10 m and the voltage protection level of the remaining SPD is sufficiently coordinated with the PV array impulse withstand voltage, the additional SPD may not be necessary.

PV Installation With External LPS and Separation Distance Maintained

Clause 6.2.2 addresses a building with an external lightning protection system where the required separation distance between the LPS and PV installation is maintained.

Again, IEC generally shows protection at both ends but permits omission under specified conditions.

The DC-side 10 m principle in Clause 9.2.5 applies to this configuration as well.

PV Installation With External LPS and Separation Distance Not Maintained

This is a more severe condition.

When the required separation distance cannot be maintained, conductive PV components may become part of the lightning-current path.

IEC 61643-32 specifies Class I tested SPDs at the relevant locations for this configuration, and Clause 9.2.5 notes that the second SPD at the inverter is mandatory for the case described in 6.2.3.

If the difference between Class I, Class II and the commonly used Type 1, Type 2 and Type 1+2 terminology is unclear, see our guide to DC SPD classes and types.

Therefore:

Do not use distance alone to decide the SPD Type when an external lightning protection system is involved.

The LPS design and separation distance must be evaluated first.

What Does “One Set of SPDs May Be Enough” Really Mean?

This sentence is important.

IEC does not say:

“If the PV cable is 9 meters long, one SPD is always enough.”

It says one set may be enough.

Why?

Because distance is only one factor.

The SPD voltage protection level still has to be coordinated with the impulse withstand voltage of the equipment being protected.

IEC uses:

Uw = rated impulse withstand voltage of the equipment

and

Up = voltage protection level of the SPD.

For effective equipment protection, IEC 61643-32 states that Up must be lower than Uw and generally recommends maintaining at least a 20% safety margin:

Up ≤ 0.8 × Uw

subject to the applicable exceptions and coordination conditions.

So a short cable does not excuse poor SPD selection.

The SPD still has to be electrically suitable for the equipment.

For a broader selection workflow covering voltage rating, Up, discharge-current ratings and installation conditions, see how to size a DC SPD for a solar PV array.

A Simple PV Example

Consider two systems using exactly the same Type 2 DC SPD.

System A

PV Array → 5 m DC Cable → SPD → Inverter

The SPD is close to the inverter.

System B

PV Array → SPD → 30 m DC Cable → Inverter

Both systems contain one SPD.

But they should not automatically be treated as equivalent protection designs.

For the relevant IEC configurations, System B crosses the 10 m distance described in Clause 9.2.5, meaning protection at both ends must be considered according to the standard requirement.

The arrangement would typically become:

PV Array → SPD 1 → 30 m DC Cable → SPD 2 → Inverter

The exact SPD test class and ratings depend on the lightning protection condition and installation design.

The important point is:

One SPD located somewhere on a long PV cable does not automatically provide sufficient coordinated protection at both ends.

What If the SPD Is Inside the PV Combiner Box?

In this situation, SPD distance from inverter becomes particularly important because the protection device may be located at one end of a long DC cable.

This is one of the most common real-world situations.

A commercial PV system may look like:

PV Strings

↓

PV Combiner Box

• string fuses
• DC isolator
• DC SPD

↓

Long DC Cable

↓

Inverter

An installer opens the combiner box and sees a Type 2 SPD.

The natural question is:

“Why would I need another SPD? There is already one here.”

If the inverter is only a short distance away, the existing arrangement may satisfy the applicable protection requirements.

But if the cable route between the PV generator and inverter reaches the distance defined by IEC 61643-32, protection at both ends becomes relevant.

Phoenix Contact’s current PV application guidance follows the same basic arrangement: it identifies DC surge protection near the PV panels and DC protection near the inverter and specifically uses 10 m as the cable-distance criterion for the inverter-side location.

So the combiner-box SPD is not “wrong.”

It may simply represent only one protection location within a larger surge-protection concept.

What If the Inverter Already Has a Built-In SPD?

Now the situation becomes more interesting.

Suppose the system is:

PV Array → External SPD → 25 m DC Cable → Inverter with Built-In Type 2 SPD

Potentially, you already have protection at both ends.

But you cannot confirm that from the words:

“Built-in SPD”

alone.

You need to check what is actually inside the inverter.

Important questions include:

• Is the built-in SPD on the DC side?
• Does it protect every relevant DC input or MPPT arrangement?
• Is it Type 2 or Type 1+2?
• What is its Ucpv?
• What is its Up?
• Is it replaceable?
• Does the inverter manufacturer count it as part of the required system surge protection?
• Are additional external SPDs specified in the installation manual?

A built-in SPD may form part of the inverter-side protection stage.

But:

Built-in SPD does not automatically mean complete PV-system surge protection.

If this is the situation in your system, read My Solar Inverter Already Has an SPD — Do I Still Need an External SPD? for a detailed explanation of when built-in and external protection may need to work together.

This is why SPD location and inverter documentation must be considered together.

SPD Distance From Inverter Checker

Why Must SPD Connecting Wires Be So Short?

Now return to the second distance problem.

Even if your SPD is installed at exactly the correct system location, its wiring can still reduce protection performance.

Consider:

Installation A

DC conductor → short connection → SPD → short PE connection

and:

Installation B

DC conductor → long loop → SPD → long loop → PE

The SPD model is identical.

Its datasheet Up is identical.

Its Imax is identical.

But the installed protection can be different.

Phoenix Contact explains that excessive SPD connection length raises the effective voltage protection level because of voltage developed across the conductor inductance. Its installation guidance references the 0.5 m connection-length principle and shows how conductor voltage has to be added to the SPD protection level when evaluating the complete installed protection.

IEC 61643-32 gives the same practical message for the DC side:

keep the SPD connecting cables as short as possible.

The 0.5 m figure should therefore be treated as a wiring target, not as a reason to mount an SPD exactly 500 mm from the inverter.

An Engineering Example of Lead-Inductance Voltage

Suppose we use a simplified conductor inductance of:

L ≈ 1 µH/m

and a surge-current rise of:

10 kA in 10 µs

Then:

di/dt = 1 kA/µs

For one meter:

ΔU = L × di/dt

ΔU ≈ 1 µH × 1 kA/µs

ΔU ≈ 1 kV

This is the type of example Phoenix Contact uses to demonstrate why lead length matters.

But this should not be turned into a calculator that claims:

“Every meter always adds exactly 1 kV.”

It does not.

Real values change with:

• conductor spacing,
• conductor shape,
• routing,
• loop geometry,
• current waveform,
• current magnitude,
• and the actual surge-current path.

The calculation is best used to explain the physics, not to produce false precision.

Can I Solve the Distance Problem by Using a Higher-kA SPD?

No.

Suppose one SPD has:

Imax = 40 kA

and another:

Imax = 80 kA

It is tempting to think:

“If my SPD is far from the inverter, I will simply install the 80 kA model.”

That does not solve the placement problem.

Imax describes the maximum discharge-current capability under the specified 8/20 µs test conditions.

It does not eliminate:

• long cable routes,
• conductor inductance,
• poor bonding,
• incorrect SPD location,
• excessive connecting-lead length,
• or lack of SPD coordination.

A higher Imax may be appropriate for some installations, but it is not a substitute for correct SPD placement.

Can a Lower Up Solve a Long-Distance Installation?

Again, not by itself.

A lower Up can improve equipment protection because it means the SPD limits voltage to a lower level under its specified test conditions.

But the final installed protection depends on the complete circuit.

For example:

SPD A

Up = 2.0 kV
Very long connecting conductors

SPD B

Up = 2.5 kV
Very short, direct connections

You cannot determine which installation produces the lower voltage at the equipment terminals from the SPD label alone.

The conductor voltage contribution also matters.

That is why SPD selection and SPD installation should never be treated as separate topics.

Does the Cable Route Matter, or Only the Cable Length?

The physical cable route matters too.

Cable length is an easy number to measure, but electromagnetic behavior is influenced by geometry.

For surge currents, good practice includes:

• keeping outgoing and return/current-path conductors close together where appropriate,
• minimizing loop area,
• avoiding unnecessary conductor loops,
• using short bonding paths,
• and following the SPD manufacturer’s recommended connection arrangement.

IEC 61643-32 itself emphasizes minimizing loop areas in DC-side installation diagrams and recommends direct earthing between SPD and inverter for optimum overvoltage protection.

So two systems with the same “10 m cable length” are not necessarily electromagnetically identical.

What Changes on the AC Side of the Inverter?

An inverter is connected to more than one electrical system.

It has a DC input from the PV array and an AC connection to the distribution system.

IEC 61643-32 also addresses the AC side of the PV installation.

For the AC side, it recommends that where the wiring between the SPD near the origin of the electrical installation and the inverter is 10 m or more, the inverter should be protected by an additional SPD adjacent to the inverter.

For the more severe external-LPS configuration described in Clause 6.2.3, the additional SPD at the inverter is mandatory.

Phoenix Contact’s current selection guidance follows the same basic structure, showing an additional AC-side SPD near the inverter when the cable length to the main distribution is 10 m or more.

Therefore:

A DC SPD does not replace AC surge protection.

Both electrical interfaces need to be assessed.

SPD placement is only one part of the overall protection architecture. For the relationship between SPDs, gPV fuses, DC isolators, combiner boxes and inverter protection, see our complete solar PV electrical protection guide.

Do Communication Cables Need Attention Too?

Modern PV inverters may also be connected to:

• RS-485,
• Ethernet,
• energy meters,
• data loggers,
• sensors,
• remote monitoring systems,
• weather stations,
• or control equipment.

These conductors can provide another path for transient overvoltages.

IEC 61643-32 states that when SPDs are required for the power circuits, surge protection should also be considered for telecommunications and signalling circuits associated with the PV system. Phoenix Contact makes the same practical recommendation for common inverter interfaces such as Ethernet and RS-485.

So an engineer reviewing inverter surge protection should ask:

“What conductors enter the inverter?”

not only:

“Where is the DC SPD?”

What If the Building Has an External Lightning Protection System?

This is where simplified internet advice becomes especially risky.

If a building has an external lightning protection system (LPS), first determine whether the required separation distance s between the lightning protection system and the PV installation is maintained.

Separation Distance Maintained

For the IEC configuration where the external LPS exists but separation distance is maintained, Class II tested PV SPDs are used at the relevant DC locations in the arrangement described by IEC 61643-32.

The 10 m DC-side placement principle still applies to the configuration covered by 6.2.2.

Separation Distance Not Maintained

If separation distance cannot be maintained, parts of the PV system can carry partial lightning current.

This changes the required protection concept.

IEC 61643-32 specifies Class I tested SPDs at the relevant locations for this configuration, and the protection arrangement becomes more stringent.

This is why you should never decide:

“Type 2 is enough because the cable is only 8 meters.”

without first knowing the lightning protection condition.

Distance is only one part of the design.

Practical Installation Scenarios

Scenario 1: Small Rooftop PV System

PV Array → 6 m DC Cable → Inverter

No external LPS.

A suitable SPD is installed close to the inverter.

In this case, one set of DC SPDs may be sufficient if the applicable IEC conditions, Up coordination, equipment withstand voltage, and manufacturer instructions are satisfied.

The fact that the distance is below 10 m helps, but it is not the only requirement.

Scenario 2: Combiner Box 25 m From the Inverter

PV Array → Combiner Box + SPD → 25 m DC Cable → Inverter

For the relevant IEC 61643-32 configurations, the distance is ≥10 m.

Protection should therefore be provided at both ends in accordance with the standard arrangement.

A second suitable SPD close to the inverter is required for the configurations addressed by Clause 9.2.5.

Scenario 3: Inverter Has Built-In Type 2 DC SPD

PV Array → External SPD → 25 m DC Cable → Built-In SPD → Inverter

This may already resemble a two-location protection concept.

But the built-in device must be checked against:

• IEC classification,
• Ucpv,
• Up,
• protected poles/modes,
• inverter topology,
• and manufacturer instructions.

Do not remove the external SPD simply because the inverter datasheet says “SPD included.”

Scenario 4: SPD Beside the Inverter but With Long Leads

PV Array → Inverter Cabinet

Inside the cabinet:

DC terminal → 80 cm wire → SPD → 70 cm PE wire

The system-level location may be good.

The SPD wiring is not.

The long connecting conductors can increase the installed protection level because of their inductive voltage.

In this case, the first fix is not necessarily another SPD.

It may be to redesign the connection.

Scenario 5: Building With External LPS and Separation Distance Not Maintained

Now cable distance alone is no longer the main issue.

The system has to account for partial lightning current, lightning equipotential bonding, SPD test class, and the complete LPS design.

This requires a lightning-protection-based SPD design rather than a simple “less than or greater than 10 m” decision.

Quick Engineering Decision Table

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: “One SPD Protects the Entire PV System”

An SPD protects according to its location, installation, and coordination with the rest of the system.

A device installed at one end of a long conductor should not automatically be assumed to provide the same protection at the other end.

Mistake 2: “10 m Is Just a Recommendation From SPD Manufacturers”

No.

The 10 m distinction appears directly in IEC 61643-32.

For the relevant DC-side configurations, ≥10 m leads to a two-SPD requirement for sufficient protection of both PV modules and inverter.

Mistake 3: “9.9 m Means One SPD Is Definitely Enough”

Also incorrect.

Below 10 m, IEC says one set may be sufficient.

Protection-level coordination and the rest of the installation still matter.

Mistake 4: “0.5 m Means the SPD Must Be Within 0.5 m of the Inverter”

No.

The 0.5 m guidance refers to the SPD’s relevant connecting conductors.

It is not the same measurement as the PV-array-to-inverter distance.

Mistake 5: “A Bigger kA Rating Fixes Poor Placement”

No.

Imax does not compensate for long conductors, poor bonding, or incorrect protection location.

Mistake 6: “A Built-In SPD Means External SPDs Are Unnecessary”

Not automatically.

Built-in protection has to be evaluated as part of the full PV protection concept.

Mistake 7: “If the DC Side Is Protected, the Inverter Is Protected”

The inverter also connects to AC and often to communication lines.

All possible surge-entry paths should be reviewed.

Field Checklist Before Deciding Whether You Need Another SPD

Before deciding that one SPD is enough, check:

PV Layout

• distance along the cable route between PV array and inverter;
• location of combiner boxes;
• location of existing SPDs;
• outdoor and indoor cable sections.

SPD

• IEC test class / SPD Type;
• Ucpv;
• Up;
• In;
• Imax or Iimp where applicable;
• Iscpv;
• protected modes;
• backup protection requirements.

Inverter

• rated maximum DC voltage;
• rated impulse withstand voltage Uw, if available;
• built-in DC SPD;
• built-in AC SPD;
• manufacturer’s external SPD requirements.

Installation

• SPD lead length;
• bonding conductor length;
• cable routing;
• loop area;
• PE routing;
• earthing arrangement.

Lightning Protection

• external LPS present or absent;
• required separation distance;
• whether separation distance is maintained;
• lightning equipotential bonding requirements.

Only after these points are understood should the designer decide whether an additional SPD is unnecessary, recommended, or required.

FAQ

Does the distance between the SPD and inverter really matter?

Yes.

The physical distance between protected parts of the PV system is specifically considered in IEC 61643-32, and long SPD connection leads can also increase the effective installed protection level.

These are two separate effects.

Do I need two DC SPDs when the PV array is 15 m from the inverter?

For PV installations covered by IEC 61643-32 Clauses 6.2.1 and 6.2.2, when the cable-route distance E between PV modules and inverter is equal to or greater than 10 m, Clause 9.2.5 requires two sets of SPDs to sufficiently protect both ends.

The exact SPD class and ratings still depend on the system and lightning protection arrangement.

If the distance is only 8 m, is one SPD definitely enough?

No.

IEC states that one set may be enough below 10 m.

The SPD voltage protection level, equipment impulse withstand voltage, installation arrangement, and other conditions still need to be satisfied.

Where should the single SPD be installed if the distance is less than 10 m?

IEC notes that common PV modules generally have a higher rated impulse withstand voltage than the inverter, and therefore recommends installing the SPD close to the inverter when one set is used.

Is 10 m measured as straight-line distance?

For practical application, the relevant distance is the electrical cable-route distance between the units, not simply the straight-line distance measured through the air.

Is 0.5 m the distance between the SPD and inverter?

No.

For the DC-side arrangement in IEC 61643-32 Clause 9.2.5, the 0.5 m recommendation refers to the total relevant SPD connecting leads, identified as L1 + L2 in the standard example.

Why does longer SPD wiring reduce protection?

Because the connecting conductors have inductance.

During a fast-rising surge current, the conductor develops an additional voltage:

ΔU = L × di/dt

This additional voltage contributes to the installed voltage appearing at the protected equipment.

Can an inverter’s built-in SPD count as the inverter-side SPD?

Potentially, yes.

But its Type/test class, Ucpv, Up, protected circuit arrangement, installation, and manufacturer requirements must first be verified.

Do not assume all built-in SPDs are equivalent.

Does a DC SPD protect the inverter from AC-side surges?

No.

DC and AC are separate surge paths.

The AC-side protection arrangement must be evaluated separately.

What if my building has an external lightning protection system?

First determine whether the required separation distance between the external LPS and PV installation is maintained.

If it is not maintained, IEC 61643-32 applies a more stringent lightning-current protection arrangement using Class I tested SPDs at the relevant locations.

Final Answer

Yes. SPD distance from inverter matters in solar PV surge protection design.

But there are two different distances that must not be confused.

The first is:

the cable-route distance between the PV array and inverter.

For the relevant IEC 61643-32 configurations:

E < 10 m

→ one set of SPDs may be sufficient if the required protection conditions are met.

E ≥ 10 m

→ two sets of SPDs are necessary to sufficiently protect both PV modules and inverter.

The second distance is:

the length of the SPD’s own connecting conductors.

These conductors should be kept as short as possible, with IEC 61643-32 giving a preferred total lead length of no more than approximately 0.5 m for the DC-side arrangement shown in Clause 9.2.5.

Neither rule should be used alone.

A technically sound PV surge-protection design also considers:

Up, Uw, Ucpv, SPD test class, lightning protection system, separation distance, bonding, earthing, cable routing, inverter built-in protection, AC-side protection, and SPD coordination.

The useful question is therefore not:

“How many SPDs does my solar system have?”

It is:

“Are the SPDs positioned, selected, and connected so that every vulnerable part of the system receives the required protection?”

That is the difference between simply installing an SPD and designing a coordinated surge-protection system.

Need Help Reviewing Your PV SPD Layout?

If you are unsure whether the existing SPD is far enough from the inverter to require another protection stage, send us:

• PV system voltage,
• inverter model,
• array-to-inverter cable distance,
• existing SPD location,
• SPD specifications,
• and a simple system layout.

KUANGYA can help you identify the SPD parameters and installation positions that should be checked before product selection.

You can also view our DC surge protective devices for solar PV systems for available Type 2 and Type 1+2 DC SPD options.

KUANGYA — Surge Protection for Solar PV Systems